Showing posts with label CNET. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CNET. Show all posts

Friday, August 15, 2014

Sources: Cop had close relationship with suspected dealer's sibling


GROSS
The Troy police officer arrested for allegedly tipping off drug dealers, spoiling a five-house raid by the State Police, had a close relationship with the sister of one of the suspects, according to multiple sources.
According to sources, “Person No. 1” in the felony complaint filed by Attorney General Eric Schneiderman works in the Child Protective Services division of the Rensselaer County Department of Social Services and makes $52,000 a year. Officer Brian Gross, who is currently suspended without pay, and the person have or had a longtime, close personal relationship, according to sources.
“Person No. 2” in the document (shown below) charging Gross with felony tampering with physical evidence and three misdemeanors – obstruction of governmental operation and two counts of official misconduct – is Person No. 1's brother.
State Police raided the home of Person No. 2 and four other houses in Rensselaer County expecting to make multiple arrests and seize a good quantity of drugs. They came up empty, “despite extensive evidence of drug activity,” according to the complaint. Gross allegedly told Person No. 1 about the raid to warn Person No. 2. Person No. 2 then gave a heads up to the other suspects.
T-Spin is withholding the names of Persons No. 1 and No. 2 because neither has been charged. Although, it is widely believed that Person No. 1 could be charged with at least obstruction of governmental operation. That, of course, depends on whether or not she struck a deal with the AG’s office to act as a witness should the case go to trial.
Person No. 2 was not arrested in the raid so naming either person paints Person No. 2 as a drug dealer with enough traffic through his Brunswick home – which is right outside the Troy border – to justify a State Police investigation. That is not an official allegation at this time.  
According to the complaint, State Police were prepared to raid five homes in Rensselaer County on Feb. 12 after a lengthy investigation. A source said investigators had been “sitting on a wire” for close to year before executing the raid. “Sitting on a wire” refers to listening to conversations via electronic devices.
Gross was part of a small drug task force at the Troy Police Department and was assigned to the State Police Community Narcotics Enforcement Team so he had knowledge of internal details of the investigation, according to the complaint.
The first Obstruction of Justice charge is from the middle of January, according to the complaint, when Gross texted Person No. 1 and requested they meet. Person No. 1 told State Police investigators that Gross told Person No. 1 that Person No. 2 has to “’watch (Person No. 2’s) back’ because (Person No. 2) is doing something that had come to the attention of the State Police.”
According to phone records cited in the complaint, on Feb. 10, Gross texted Person No. 1 again and she told State Police Investigator Dennis Churns that Gross told her that “there better not be any drugs inside the home of (Person No. 2) because ‘there was a good chance the police would get a warrant.’”
Person No. 1 then said she went to Person No. 2 and told him that if “he is doing anything he needed to ‘cut the shit’ and get any drugs out of his house.”
It’s unclear whether Gross allegedly sent the text message to protect Person No. 1’s relative or if Person No. 1 used the text to harm Gross. Or if it’s a combination – either intentional or an inadvertent byproduct - of the two. In other words, if it wasn’t an intentional set up by Person No. 1, when confronted with the allegations, Person No. 1 and/or No. 2 decided it was easier to talk than face further scrutiny.
 As far as the felony complaint is concerned, according to lawyers who have reviewed it, the AG has a weak case based on just the text messages and testimony from one person who might or might not have an ulterior agenda, and from another suspected of dealing large quantities of illegal narcotics.
Also, as was previously written, it was difficult to find a motive for a 10-plus year cop - with a clean personal and professional record - to tip off drug dealers. The personal relationship with Person No. 1 is one avenue the AG’s office has explored, according to a number of sources.
Gross is represented by attorney Steve Coffey, who declined comment. Troy Police Chief John Tedesco was unavailable for comment as were the State Police and the AG’s office.  

Sunday, August 3, 2014

A cop, drug dealers and questions


GROSS
In the days following the arrest of a 10-year police officer for tipping off drug dealers, some common questions heard around town are: Why? What was his motive? Did he even do it?
Officer Brian Gross is, by all accounts, a well-respected and well-liked cop. He was a member of the highly trained elite Emergency Response Team, similar to SWAT, and a member of the Special Operations Section, which conducts in-depth drug investigations. He is often called upon to train rookie cops. He has a construction related business on the side and is known to have an unimpeachable work ethic. He is married with two children and they all live in a nice home in Brunswick. A storybook life.
So, why?
One thing everyone agrees on is the proof presented in the felony complaint filed by Attorney General Eric Schneiderman – based on an investigation by the State Police - is pretty weak. Gross set up a meeting with someone and that someone told investigators that Gross told him to tell someone else about the raid. That’s a he said/she said scenario with an extra “he” thrown in.
If Gross is innocent, I hope Schneiderman had something more than a text and a statement from a guy in the drug world before he brought charges. If Gross is guilty, I hope the same thing.
Before I get into the more common scuttlebutt themes of why Gross is in this most unenviable spot, remember that he is a 10-year veteran of a pretty busy department so he should know the ropes a little bit. Now, without further ado:
-He’s a fall guy for State Police investigators on the Community Narcotics Enforcement Team, who spent who knows how much time, energy and effort – not to mention money – to set up a raid of five houses only to come up empty. Gross reached out to someone for whatever reason and that someone reached out to someone else and no drugs were found. In the minds of some, 2 + 2 = 5 and he was arrested for tipping off the drug dealers.
-Gross knew the guy he texted from his time on the SOS and tried to set up a routine meeting and the guy is making the rest of it up to save his own ass. Drug dealers are not pillars of the community and I’m fairly certain it wouldn’t be the first time one told a lie, especially when you have the State Police and the AG offering you a deal.   
-On the flip side of that, Gross, through SOS or just by being a cop, could have become friendly with the guy he was texting and the guy who the guy ended up talking to and was doing them an ill-advised favor. Cops, by the nature of the job, spend half their time with people on the “good” side and half with those on the “bad.” Cops and criminals are people too so I’m sure some cops and criminals get along just fine. I’m fairly certain there is a line somewhere that shouldn’t be crossed, and if Gross did what he’s accused I’m even more certain that it constitutes crossing the line.
-Gross was getting paid off by the drug dealers. I guess it’s always a possibility. But people are finding it hard to believe he is even a little dirty, and it doesn’t get much dirtier than putting your colleagues’ lives at risk by tipping off drug dealers. The pay off, too, just can’t be worth it. Then again, greed is one of the seven deadlies.
-He’s on drugs. I find this one hard to believe too because if someone is using drugs to the point of putting everything at risk by tipping off a dealer then someone is going to know and it would have leaked out by now.
-A family member got jammed up somehow and if Gross didn’t help out the drug dealers then that family member was in danger. I’m not sure if I buy this one, but I guess it’s a possibility.

-Or, it could be a combination of any of the above or something completely different.
I guess we won’t know until the case works its way through the court system – if it even gets that far.